Following are the criteria used to evaluate a thesis. You can obtain a copy of the evaluation grading form from the School of Business.
Content (30%)
The content of the thesis must pertain to management issues. It must result in a pragmatic conclusion supported by fundamental concepts and theories. The scope and depth of the topic must consider time and resource constraints, but must result in a complete and professional, graduate-level work. The thesis must address current or future needs of society or business, and must permit the student to demonstrate a significant creative contribution that extends beyond reporting the results of a search of the literature.
Research (25%)
The breadth and scope of the literature search must be compatible with the topic selected and should provide a balanced and objective perspective on the subject matter. The search should include all major scholarly and professional literature relevant and important to the topic. The accurate interpretation and proper recognition of source materials are requirements of good research. The documentation of the research materials will be consistent with the guidelines established for the MSEM thesis. Plagiarism will result in rejection of the work and the student’s dismissal from the MSEM program.
Composition (15%)
The completed thesis will be presented in a formal and serious style consistent with MSOE’s academic standards. The final document should be well written, which includes: proper sentence and paragraph structure; logical flow of information; proper grammar, punctuation, and vocabulary; and graphics. Composition also includes technical accuracy and attention to detail and language compatible with current culture and etiquette. Above all, the final document should convey clarity; that is, can the intended audience understand the key issues and conclusions without revisiting various parts of the document over and over to glean vital information.
Oral Presentation (5%)
The student will be judged on the visible impression he or she leaves in the course of formally presenting the work to the Examination Committee and in answering the committee’s questions and inquiries. Among the areas to be considered are:
1. Preparation of a concise, meaningful summary of the work.
2. Visual aids and handouts.
3. Communication skills including body language and eye contact.
4. Sincerity, honesty, and integrity.
5. Receiving, analyzing, and responding to questions, inquiries, and challenges.
6. Handling of errors discovered in the course of the presentation.
7. Formality of dress and presentation (the oral presentation is a formal presentation).
8. Knowledge of the topic.
Outcome/Results (25%)
This category addresses the following issues:
- How much did the student learn from this experience? Will it improve the student professionally, personally, or academically? Was it worthwhile to the student?
- Did the student really understand the materials presented?
- Did the student’s work reflect the use of their knowledge of materials previously covered in the MSEM program?
- Will this work enhance the reputation of the school, the student, both?
- Was the overall effort a professional effort and was it worthwhile?